The structure of tame minimal dynamical systems for general groups
Abstract
We use the structure theory of minimal dynamical systems to show that, for a general group , a tame, metric, minimal dynamical system has the following structure: \begin{equation*} \xymatrix {& \tilde{X} \ar[dd]_\pi \ar[dl]_\eta & X^* \ar[l]_-{\theta^*} \ar[d]^{\iota} \ar@/^2pc/@{>}^{\pi^*}[dd]\\ X & & Z \ar[d]^\sigma\\ & Y & Y^* \ar[l]^\theta } \end{equation*} Here (i) is a metric minimal and tame system (ii) is a strongly proximal extension, (iii) is a strongly proximal system, (iv) is a point distal and RIM extension with unique section, (v) , and are almost one-to-one extensions, and (vi) is an isometric extension. When the map is also open this diagram reduces to \begin{equation*} \xymatrix {& \tilde{X} \ar[dl]_\eta \ar[d]^{\iota} \ar@/^2pc/@{>}^\pi[dd]\\ X & Z \ar[d]^\sigma\\ & Y } \end{equation*} In general the presence of the strongly proximal extension is unavoidable. If the system admits an invariant measure then is trivial and is an almost automorphic system; i.e. , where is an almost one-to-one extension and is equicontinuous. Moreover, is unique and is a measure theoretical isomorphism , with the Haar measure on . Thus, this is always the case when is amenable.
Keywords
Cite
@article{arxiv.1707.00150,
title = {The structure of tame minimal dynamical systems for general groups},
author = {Eli Glasner},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.00150},
year = {2018}
}
Comments
27 pages; to appear in Invent. Math. arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:math/0609503