English

The pyrochlore S=1/2 Heisenberg antiferromagnet at finite temperature

Strongly Correlated Electrons 2020-08-10 v1

Abstract

Frustrated three dimensional quantum magnets are notoriously impervious to theoretical analysis. Here we use a combination of three computational methods to investigate the three dimensional pyrochlore S=1/2S=1/2 quantum antiferromagnet, an archetypical frustrated magnet, at finite temperature, TT: canonical typicality for a finite cluster of 2×2×22\times 2 \times 2 unit cells (i.e. 3232 sites), a finite-TT matrix product state method on a larger cluster with 4848 sites, and the numerical linked cluster expansion (NLCE) using clusters up to 2525 lattice sites, which include non-trivial hexagonal and octagonal loops. We focus on thermodynamic properties (energy, specific heat capacity, entropy, susceptibility, magnetisation) next to the static structure factor. We find a pronounced maximum in the specific heat at T=0.57JT = 0.57 J, which is stable across finite size clusters and converged in the series expansion. This is well-separated from a residual amount of spectral weight of 0.47kBln20.47 k_B \ln 2 per spin which has not been released even at T0.25JT\approx0.25 J, the limit of convergence of our results. This is a large value compared to a number of highly frustrated models and materials, such as spin ice or the kagome S=1/2S=1/2 Heisenberg antiferromagnet. We also find a non-monotonic dependence on TT of the magnetisation at low magnetic fields, reflecting the dominantly non-magnetic character of the low-energy spectral weight. A detailed comparison of our results to measurements for the S=1S=1 material NaCaNi2_2F7_7 yields rough agreement of the functional form of the specific heat maximum, which in turn differs from the sharper maximum of the heat capacity of the spin ice material Dy2_2Ti2_2O7_7, all of which are yet qualitatively distinct from conventional, unfrustrated magnets.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2003.04898,
  title  = {The pyrochlore S=1/2 Heisenberg antiferromagnet at finite temperature},
  author = {Robin Schäfer and Imre Hagymási and Roderich Moessner and David J. Luitz},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.04898},
  year   = {2020}
}

Comments

23 pages, 15 figures