The Path-Extremal Conjecture for Zero Forcing: Distance-Hereditary Graphs and a Split-Decomposition Reduction

For an $n$-vertex graph $G$, let $z(G;k)$ denote the number of zero forcing sets of size $k$. A conjecture of Boyer et al. asserts that the path $P_n$ maximizes these numbers coefficientwise among all $n$-vertex graphs; equivalently, the zero forcing polynomial of every $n$-vertex graph should be coefficientwise dominated by that of $P_n$. We prove this path-extremal conjecture for distance-hereditary graphs. This extends the previously known tree case to a much larger class that includes, in particular, all trees and all cographs. We then use canonical split decomposition to push the argument one step beyond the distance-hereditary setting. Specifically, we show that if a split-prime graph $H$ and all of its induced subgraphs are path-extremal, then every connected graph whose canonical split decomposition has a unique prime bag whose label graph is isomorphic to $H$ is also path-extremal. As a corollary, for each fixed $m$, if every induced subgraph of every split-prime graph on at most $m$ vertices is path-extremal, then so is every connected graph whose canonical split decomposition has a unique prime bag of size at most $m$. Thus, on these classes, the conjecture reduces to a finite verification problem on bounded-order prime cores. Our proofs combine two counting mechanisms for non-forcing sets -- fort obstructions arising from twin pairs and a leaf recurrence -- with the accessibility description of graph-labelled trees in the canonical split decomposition. This yields a new positive instance of the path-extremal conjecture and identifies a natural structural frontier for further progress.