English

The optimal drawings of K_{5,n}

Combinatorics 2019-04-29 v2 Computational Geometry

Abstract

Zarankiewicz's Conjecture (ZC) states that the crossing number cr(Km,n)(K_{m,n}) equals Z(m,n):=\floorm2\floorm12\floorn2\floorn12Z(m,n):=\floor{\frac{m}{2}} \floor{\frac{m-1}{2}} \floor{\frac{n}{2}} \floor{\frac{n-1}{2}}. Since Kleitman's verification of ZC for K5,nK_{5,n} (from which ZC for K6,nK_{6,n} easily follows), very little progress has been made around ZC; the most notable exceptions involve computer-aided results. With the aim of gaining a more profound understanding of this notoriously difficult conjecture, we investigate the optimal (that is, crossing-minimal) drawings of K5,nK_{5,n}. The widely known natural drawings of Km,nK_{m,n} (the so-called Zarankiewicz drawings) with Z(m,n)Z(m,n) crossings contain antipodal vertices, that is, pairs of degree-mm vertices such that their induced drawing of Km,2K_{m,2} has no crossings. Antipodal vertices also play a major role in Kleitman's inductive proof that cr(K5,n)=Z(5,n)(K_{5,n}) = Z(5,n). We explore in depth the role of antipodal vertices in optimal drawings of K5,nK_{5,n}, for nn even. We prove that if {n2n \equiv 2 (mod 4)}, then every optimal drawing of K5,nK_{5,n} has antipodal vertices. We also exhibit a two-parameter family of optimal drawings Dr,sD_{r,s} of K5,4(r+s)K_{5,4(r+s)} (for r,s0r,s\ge 0), with no antipodal vertices, and show that if n0n\equiv 0 (mod 4), then every optimal drawing of K5,nK_{5,n} without antipodal vertices is (vertex rotation) isomorphic to Dr,sD_{r,s} for some integers r,sr,s. As a corollary, we show that if nn is even, then every optimal drawing of K5,nK_{5,n} is the superimposition of Zarankiewicz drawings with a drawing isomorphic to Dr,sD_{r,s} for some nonnegative integers r,sr,s.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1210.1988,
  title  = {The optimal drawings of K_{5,n}},
  author = {Cesar Hernandez-Velez and Carolina Medina and Gelasio Salazar},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1210.1988},
  year   = {2019}
}

Comments

In the previous version the bibliography was missing. Otherwise this is identical as Version 1