English

The Most Metal-poor Stars in the Magellanic Clouds are $r$-process Enhanced

Astrophysics of Galaxies 2021-11-17 v2 Solar and Stellar Astrophysics

Abstract

The chemical abundances of a galaxy's metal-poor stellar population can be used to investigate the earliest stages of its formation and chemical evolution. The Magellanic Clouds are the most massive of the Milky Way's satellite galaxies and are thought to have evolved in isolation until their recent accretion by the Milky Way. Unlike the Milky Way's less massive satellites, little is know about the Magellanic Clouds' metal-poor stars. We have used the mid-infrared metal-poor star selection of Schlaufman & Casey (2014) and archival data to target nine LMC and four SMC giants for high-resolution Magellan/MIKE spectroscopy. These nine LMC giants with 2.4[Fe/H]1.5-2.4\lesssim[\text{Fe/H}]\lesssim-1.5 and four SMC giants with 2.6[Fe/H]2.0-2.6\lesssim[\text{Fe/H}]\lesssim-2.0 are the most metal-poor stars in the Magellanic Clouds yet subject to a comprehensive abundance analysis. While we find that at constant metallicity these stars are similar to Milky Way stars in their α\alpha, light, and iron-peak elemental abundances, both the LMC and SMC are enhanced relative to the Milky Way in the rr-process element europium. These abundance offsets are highly significant, equivalent to 3.9σ3.9\sigma for the LMC, 2.7σ2.7\sigma for the SMC, and 5.0σ5.0\sigma for the complete Magellanic Cloud sample. We propose that the rr-process enhancement of the Magellanic Clouds' metal-poor stellar population is a result of the Magellanic Clouds' isolated chemical evolution and long history of accretion from the cosmic web combined with rr-process nucleosynthesis on a timescale longer than the core-collapse supernova timescale but shorter than or comparable to the thermonuclear (i.e., Type Ia) supernova timescale.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2108.10880,
  title  = {The Most Metal-poor Stars in the Magellanic Clouds are $r$-process Enhanced},
  author = {Henrique Reggiani and Kevin C. Schlaufman and Andrew R. Casey and Joshua D. Simon and Alexander P. Ji},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.10880},
  year   = {2021}
}

Comments

Accepted for publication in The Astronomical Journal. 30 pages, 7 figures, and 5 tables