English

The Most Metal-poor Stars in the Inner Bulge

Solar and Stellar Astrophysics 2020-09-30 v1 Astrophysics of Galaxies

Abstract

The bulge is the oldest component of the Milky Way. Since numerous simulations of Milky Way formation have predicted that the oldest stars at a given metallicity are found on tightly bound orbits, the Galaxy's oldest stars are likely metal-poor stars in the inner bulge with small apocenters (i.e., Rapo4R_{\mathrm{apo}}\lesssim4 kpc). In the past, stars with these properties have been impossible to find due to extreme reddening and extinction along the line of sight to the inner bulge. We have used the mid-infrared metal-poor star selection of Schlaufman & Casey (2014) on Spitzer/GLIMPSE data to overcome these problems and target candidate inner bulge metal-poor giants for moderate-resolution spectroscopy with AAT/AAOmega. We used those data to select three confirmed metal-poor giants ([Fe/H]=3.15,2.56,2.03[\mathrm{Fe/H}]=-3.15,-2.56,-2.03) for follow-up high-resolution Magellan/MIKE spectroscopy. A comprehensive orbit analysis using Gaia DR2 astrometry and our measured radial velocities confirms that these stars are tightly bound inner bulge stars. We determine the elemental abundances of each star and find high titanium and iron-peak abundances relative to iron in our most metal-poor star. We propose that the distinct abundance signature we detect is a product of nucleosynthesis in the Chandrasekhar-mass thermonuclear supernova of a CO white dwarf accreting from a helium star with a delay time of about 10 Myr. Even though chemical evolution is expected to occur quickly in the bulge, the intense star formation in the core of the nascent Milky Way was apparently able to produce at least one Chandrasekhar-mass thermonuclear supernova progenitor before chemical evolution advanced beyond [Fe/H]3[\mathrm{Fe/H}]\sim-3.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2007.12728,
  title  = {The Most Metal-poor Stars in the Inner Bulge},
  author = {Henrique Reggiani and Kevin C. Schlaufman and Andrew R. Casey and Alexander P. Ji},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.12728},
  year   = {2020}
}

Comments

AAS Accepted in July 24, 2020. 25 pages, 9 figures