The Filter Dichotomy Principle Does not Imply the Semifilter Trichotomy Principle
Logic
2015-06-29 v3 Combinatorics
Abstract
We answer Blass' question from 1989 of whether the inequality is strictly stronger than the filter dichotomy principle affirmatively. We show that there is a forcing extension in which every non-meagre filter on is ultra by finite-to-one and the semifilter trichotomy does not hold. This trichotomy says: every semifilter is either meagre or comeagre or ultra by finite-to-one. The trichotomy is equivalent to the inequality by work of Blass and Laflamme. Combinatorics of block sequences is used to establish forcing notions that preserve suitable properties of block sequences.
Keywords
Cite
@article{arxiv.1301.0396,
title = {The Filter Dichotomy Principle Does not Imply the Semifilter Trichotomy Principle},
author = {Heike Mildenberger},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1301.0396},
year = {2015}
}
Comments
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to an error in Lemma 2.9