The covering threshold of a directed acyclic graph by directed acyclic subgraphs
Abstract
Let be a directed acyclic graph other than a rooted star. It is known that there are constants and such that the following holds for the complete directed graph . There are at most directed acyclic subgraphs of that cover every -copy of , while fewer than directed acyclic subgraphs of do not cover all -copies. Here this dichotomy is considerably strengthened. Let denote the random directed graph. The {\em fractional arboricity} of is , where the maximum is over all non-singleton subgraphs of . If then is {\em totally balanced}. Complete graphs, complete multipartite graphs, cycles, trees, and, in fact, almost all graphs, are totally balanced. It is proved: 1) Let be a dag with vertices and edges other than a rooted star. For every there exists such that almost surely has the property that every set of at most directed acyclic subgraphs of does not cover all -copies of . Moreover, there exists such that the following stronger assertion holds for any such : There is an -copy in that has no more than of its edges covered by each element of . 2) If is totally balanced then for every , almost surely has a single directed acyclic subgraph that covers all its -copies. As for the first result, note that if then is about half of the edges of . In fact, for infinitely many it holds that , optimally. As for the second result, the requirement that is totally balanced cannot, generally, be relaxed.
Keywords
Cite
@article{arxiv.2205.10880,
title = {The covering threshold of a directed acyclic graph by directed acyclic subgraphs},
author = {Raphael Yuster},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.10880},
year = {2022}
}