English

The Cartan-Hadamard conjecture and The Little Prince

Differential Geometry 2017-02-14 v3

Abstract

The generalized Cartan-Hadamard conjecture says that if Ω\Omega is a domain with fixed volume in a complete, simply connected Riemannian nn-manifold MM with sectional curvature Kκ0K \le \kappa \le 0, then the boundary of Ω\Omega has the least possible boundary volume when Ω\Omega is a round nn-ball with constant curvature K=κK=\kappa. The case n=2n=2 and κ=0\kappa=0 is an old result of Weil. We give a unified proof of this conjecture in dimensions n=2n=2 and n=4n=4 when κ=0\kappa=0, and a special case of the conjecture for κ\textless0\kappa \textless{} 0 and a version for κ\textgreater0\kappa \textgreater{} 0. Our argument uses a new interpretation, based on optical transport, optimal transport, and linear programming, of Croke's proof for n=4n=4 and κ=0\kappa=0. The generalization to n=4n=4 and κ0\kappa \ne 0 is a new result. As Croke implicitly did, we relax the curvature condition KκK \le \kappa to a weaker candle condition Candle(κ)Candle(\kappa) or LCD(κ)LCD(\kappa).We also find counterexamples to a na\"ive version of the Cartan-Hadamard conjecture: For every ε\textgreater0\varepsilon \textgreater{} 0, there is a Riemannian 3-ball Ω\Omega with (1ε)(1-\varepsilon)-pinched negative curvature, and with boundary volume bounded by a function of ε\varepsilon and with arbitrarily large volume.We begin with a pointwise isoperimetric problem called "the problem of the Little Prince." Its proof becomes part of the more general method.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1303.3115,
  title  = {The Cartan-Hadamard conjecture and The Little Prince},
  author = {Benoît Kloeckner and Greg Kuperberg},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1303.3115},
  year   = {2017}
}

Comments

v3: significant rewritting of some proofs, a mistake in the proof of the ball counter-example has been corrected