English

Systematic effects from an ambient-temperature, continuously-rotating half-wave plate

Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics 2016-10-12 v3

Abstract

We present an evaluation of systematic effects associated with a continuously-rotating, ambient-temperature half-wave plate (HWP) based on two seasons of data from the Atacama B-Mode Search (ABS) experiment located in the Atacama Desert of Chile. The ABS experiment is a microwave telescope sensitive at 145 GHz. Here we present our in-field evaluation of celestial (CMB plus galactic foreground) temperature-to-polarization leakage. We decompose the leakage into scalar, dipole, and quadrupole leakage terms. We report a scalar leakage of ~0.01%, consistent with model expectations and an order of magnitude smaller than other CMB experiments have reported. No significant dipole or quadrupole terms are detected; we constrain each to be <0.07% (95% confidence), limited by statistical uncertainty in our measurement. Dipole and quadrupole leakage at this level lead to systematic error on r<0.01 before any mitigation due to scan cross-linking or boresight rotation. The measured scalar leakage and the theoretical level of dipole and quadrupole leakage produce systematic error of r<0.001 for the ABS survey and focal-plane layout before any data correction such as so-called deprojection. This demonstrates that ABS achieves significant beam systematic error mitigation from its HWP and shows the promise of continuously-rotating HWPs for future experiments.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1601.05901,
  title  = {Systematic effects from an ambient-temperature, continuously-rotating half-wave plate},
  author = {T. Essinger-Hileman and A. Kusaka and J. W. Appel and S. K. Choi and K. Crowley and S. P. Ho and N. Jarosik and L. A. Page and L. P. Parker and S. Raghunathan and S. M. Simon and S. T. Staggs and K. Visnjic},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1601.05901},
  year   = {2016}
}

Comments

11 pages, 8 figures; revision to submitted version, Fig. 5 and Eqs. (14) and (15) corrected; added Fig. 9 and description, text revisions for clarification, Fig. 5 revised for better calibration, corrected labeling errors and plotting bugs in Fig. 3, 4, and Eq. (14) and (15)

R2 v1 2026-06-22T12:34:40.197Z