English

Splitting necklaces, with constraints

Combinatorics 2020-09-24 v4

Abstract

We prove several versions of N. Alon's "necklace-splitting theorem", subject to additional constraints, as illustrated by the following results. (1) The "almost equicardinal necklace-splitting theorem" claims that, without increasing the number of cuts, one guarantees the existence of a fair splitting such that each thief is allocated (approximately) one and the same number of pieces of the necklace (including "degenerate pieces" if they exist), provided the number of thieves r=pνr=p^\nu is a prime power. (2) The "binary splitting theorem" claims that if r=2dr=2^d and the thieves are associated with the vertices of a dd-cube then, without increasing the number of cuts, one can guarantee the existence of a fair splitting such that adjacent pieces are allocated to thieves that share an edge of the cube. This result provides a positive answer to the "binary splitting necklace conjecture" of Asada at al. (Conjecture 2.11 in [7]) in the case r=2dr=2^d. (3) An interesting variation arises when the thieves have their own individual preferences. We prove several "envy-free fair necklace-splitting theorems" of various level of generality. By specialization we obtain numerous corollaries, among them envy-free versions of (a) "almost equicardinal splitting theorem", (b) "necklace-splitting theorem for rr-unavoidable preferences", (c) "envy-free binary splitting theorem", etc. As a corollary we also obtain a recent result of Avvakumov and Karasev [1] about envy-free divisions where players may prefer an empty part of the necklace.

Cite

@article{arxiv.1907.09740,
  title  = {Splitting necklaces, with constraints},
  author = {Duško Jojić and Gaiane Panina and Rade Živaljević},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.09740},
  year   = {2020}
}

Comments

A new section added (Section 7) with new consequences of the main results from Section 6

R2 v1 2026-06-23T10:28:01.951Z