Sparse graph counting and Kelley-Meka bounds for binary systems
Abstract
In a recent breakthrough, Kelley and Meka (FOCS 2023) obtained a strong upper bound on the density of sets of integers without nontrivial three-term arithmetic progressions. In this work, we extend their result, establishing similar bounds for all linear patterns defined by binary systems of linear forms, where "binary" indicates that every linear form depends on exactly two variables. Prior to our work, no strong bounds were known for such systems even in the finite field model setting. A key ingredient in our proof is a graph counting lemma. The classical graph counting lemma, developed by Thomason (Random Graphs 1985) and Chung, Graham, and Wilson (Combinatorica 1989), is a fundamental tool in combinatorics. For a fixed graph , it states that the number of copies of in a pseudorandom graph is similar to the number of copies of in a purely random graph with the same edge density as . However, this lemma is only non-trivial when is a dense graph. In this work, we prove a graph counting lemma that is also effective when is sparse. Moreover, our lemma is well-suited for density increment arguments in additive number theory. As an immediate application, we obtain a strong bound for the Tur\'an problem in abelian Cayley sum graphs: let be a finite abelian group with odd order. If a Cayley sum graph on does not contain any -clique as a subgraph, it must have at most edges. These results hinge on the technology developed by Kelley and Meka and the follow-up work by Kelley, Lovett, and Meka (STOC 2024).
Keywords
Cite
@article{arxiv.2311.12248,
title = {Sparse graph counting and Kelley-Meka bounds for binary systems},
author = {Yuval Filmus and Hamed Hatami and Kaave Hosseini and Esty Kelman},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.12248},
year = {2025}
}
Comments
[v3] This version proves the Kelley-Meka type bounds for all Binary systems of linear forms over any finite abelian group. [v4] This revised version includes a correction to Corollary 1.6, which is now stated for the Cayley sum graph. [v5] Added some related works, fixed typos