English

Social welfare in one-sided matchings: Random priority and beyond

Computer Science and Game Theory 2014-05-07 v2

Abstract

We study the problem of approximate social welfare maximization (without money) in one-sided matching problems when agents have unrestricted cardinal preferences over a finite set of items. Random priority is a very well-known truthful-in-expectation mechanism for the problem. We prove that the approximation ratio of random priority is Theta(n^{-1/2}) while no truthful-in-expectation mechanism can achieve an approximation ratio better than O(n^{-1/2}), where n is the number of agents and items. Furthermore, we prove that the approximation ratio of all ordinal (not necessarily truthful-in-expectation) mechanisms is upper bounded by O(n^{-1/2}), indicating that random priority is asymptotically the best truthful-in-expectation mechanism and the best ordinal mechanism for the problem.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1403.1508,
  title  = {Social welfare in one-sided matchings: Random priority and beyond},
  author = {Aris Filos-Ratsikas and Søren Kristoffer Stiil Frederiksen and Jie Zhang},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1403.1508},
  year   = {2014}
}

Comments

13 pages