Second order asymptotics for the number of times an estimator is more than epsilon from its target value
Abstract
Suppose is a strongly consistent sequence of estimators for a parameter , where is based on the first observations. Consider , the number of times . In another paper (Hjort and Fenstad, 1992) we have shown that has a limit distribution as , depending only on , the standard deviation of the limit distribution for , under natural regularity conditions. The present paper investigates some second order asymptotics for differences between variables. The limit of is calculated in cases where goes to 1, leading to a notion of `asymptotic relative deficiency' in cases where the asymptotic relative efficiency is 1. This is used to distinguish between competing estimators with identical limit distributions. Thus using denominator in the familiar formula for estimating a normal variance is better than both and and indeed all other choices, for example, in the sense of leading to the smallest possible expected number of errors. Results of this type are found in a selection of familiar estimation problems, using limit results for expected differences, and are compared to corresponding asymptotic relative deficiency analysis in the sense of Hodges and Lehmann. Some second order distributional results are reached as well. It is shown how times a -difference tends to a variable which is related to some exponential distributions associated with Brownian motion, and that have recently been investigated by Hjort and Khasminskii (1993).
Keywords
Cite
@article{arxiv.2603.09314,
title = {Second order asymptotics for the number of times an estimator is more than epsilon from its target value},
author = {Nils Lid Hjort and Grete Fenstad},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.09314},
year = {2026}
}
Comments
11 pages, no figures; Statistical Research Report, Department of Mathematics, University of Oslo, September 1994, but now arXiv'd March 2026. The paper has appeared in essentially this form in Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 1995, vol. 48, pages 261-275, at this url: www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/037837589500008W