English

Scalar--Field Amplitudes in Black--Hole Evaporation

General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology 2009-11-10 v2

Abstract

We study the quantum-mechanical decay of a Schwarzschild-like black hole into almost-flat space and weak radiation at a very late time, evaluating quantum amplitudes (not just probabilities) for transitions from initial to final states. No information is lost. The model contains gravity and a massless scalar field. The quantum amplitude to go from given initial to final bosonic data in a slightly complexified time-interval T=τexp(iθ)T={\tau}{\exp}(-i{\theta}) at infinity is approximately exp(I)\exp(-I), where II is the (complex) Euclidean action of the classical solution filling in between the boundary data. And in a locally supersymmetric (supergravity) theory, the amplitude const. exp(-I) is exact. Dirichlet boundary data for gravity and the scalar field are posed on an initial spacelike hypersurface extending to spatial infinity, just prior to collapse, and on a corresponding final spacelike surface, sufficiently far to the future of the initial surface to catch all the Hawking radiation. In an averaged sense this radiation has an approximately spherically-symmetric distribution. If the time-interval TT were exactly real, the resulting `hyperbolic Dirichlet boundary-value problem' would not be well posed. If instead (`Euclidean strategy'), one takes TT complex, as above (0<θπ/20<\theta{\leq}{\pi}/2), the field equations become strongly elliptic, with a unique solution to the classical boundary-value problem. Expanding the bosonic part of the action to quadratic order in perturbations about the classical solution gives the quantum amplitude for weak-field final configurations, up to normalization. Such amplitudes are calculated for weak final scalar fields.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.gr-qc/0407086,
  title  = {Scalar--Field Amplitudes in Black--Hole Evaporation},
  author = {A. N. St. J. Farley and P. D. D'Eath},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:gr-qc/0407086},
  year   = {2009}
}

Comments

Submitted to Physics Letters B, Friday 23rd July 2004