Remarks on derived complete modules and complexes
Abstract
Let be a commutative ring and a finitely generated ideal. We discuss two definitions of derived -adically complete (also derived -torsion) complexes of -modules which appear in the literature: the idealistic and the sequential one. The two definitions are known to be equivalent for a weakly proregular ideal ; we show that they are different otherwise. We argue that the sequential approach works well, but the idealistic one needs to be reinterpreted or properly understood. We also consider -adically flat -modules.
Keywords
Cite
@article{arxiv.2002.12331,
title = {Remarks on derived complete modules and complexes},
author = {Leonid Positselski},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.12331},
year = {2023}
}
Comments
LaTeX 2e with xy-pic and tikz-cd; 40 pages, 3+2 commutative diagrams; v.3: abstract rewritten, last section "Conclusion" expanded with two commutative diagrams inserted; v.4: Proposition 1.3(d), Lemma 1.4, Examples 1.8, Remarks 2.4, 5.6, 6.1, 7.3 inserted, the definition of a contraherent cosheaf spelled out in Section 2; v.5: references updated