Urgent suspected colorectal cancer (CRC) referrals create operational bottlenecks because semi-structured clinical documents often require manual review and transcription. The original RAPTOR system used Large Language Models for structured extraction but relied on a separate OCR stage, making it vulnerable to handwriting, layout variation, and loss of visual evidence linkage. We present RAPTOR+, a multimodal extension that uses Vision-Language Models (VLMs) for end-to-end referral understanding. We evaluate fine-tuned VLMs, commercial and open-source zero-shot VLMs, and the original OCR-based pipeline on 223 clinically curated CRC urgent referral forms. We also introduce a grounding-aware evaluation framework that measures both extraction accuracy and evidence localisation. Results show a clear grounding gap in zero-shot models. Gemini 2.5 Flash achieved 92.6% Reading Accuracy but only 1.2% Strict Safety. In contrast, fine-tuned Qwen3-VL-8B achieved 96.1% Reading Accuracy and 60.6% Strict Safety, substantially improving verifiable evidence grounding. These findings show that task-specific fine-tuning is essential for reliable, auditable clinical document understanding. RAPTOR+ enables extracted referral decisions to be linked to visual evidence, supporting safer and more efficient cancer referral triage.
@article{arxiv.2605.25956,
title = {RAPTOR+: A Visually Grounded Vision-Language Framework to Improve Clinical Trust and Auditability in Automated Cancer Referral Processing},
author = {Sofiat Abioye and Ufaq Khan and Shazad Ashraf and Anusha Jose and Benjamin Wallace and William Poulett and Adam Byfield and Lukman Akanbi and Muhammad Bilal},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.25956},
year = {2026}
}