Specialized curricula for training vision-language models in retinal image analysis
Abstract
Clinicians spend a significant amount of time reviewing medical images and transcribing their findings regarding patient diagnosis, referral and treatment in text form. Vision-language models (VLMs), which automatically interpret images and summarize their findings as text, have enormous potential to alleviate clinical workloads and increase patient access to high-quality medical care. While foundational models have stirred considerable interest in the medical community, it is unclear whether their general capabilities translate to real-world clinical utility. In this work, we demonstrate that OpenAI's ChatGPT-4o model, in addition to two foundation VLMs designed for medical use, markedly underperform compared to practicing ophthalmologists on specialist tasks crucial to the care of patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD). To address this, we initially identified the essential capabilities required for image-based clinical decision-making, and then developed a curriculum to selectively train VLMs in these skills. The resulting model, RetinaVLM, can be instructed to write reports that significantly outperform those written by leading foundation medical VLMs and ChatGPT-4o in disease staging (F1 score of 0.63 vs. 0.33) and patient referral (0.67 vs. 0.50), and approaches the diagnostic performance of junior ophthalmologists (who achieve 0.77 and 0.78 on the respective tasks). Furthermore, in a single-blind reader study two senior ophthalmologists with up to 32 years of experience found RetinaVLM's reports were found to be substantially more accurate than those by ChatGPT-4o (64.3% vs. 14.3%). These results reinforce that our curriculum-based approach provides a blueprint towards specializing foundation medical VLMs for real-world clinical tasks.
Cite
@article{arxiv.2407.08410,
title = {Specialized curricula for training vision-language models in retinal image analysis},
author = {Robbie Holland and Thomas R. P. Taylor and Christopher Holmes and Sophie Riedl and Julia Mai and Maria Patsiamanidi and Dimitra Mitsopoulou and Paul Hager and Philip Müller and Hendrik P. N. Scholl and Hrvoje Bogunović and Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth and Daniel Rueckert and Sobha Sivaprasad and Andrew J. Lotery and Martin J. Menten},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.08410},
year = {2025}
}
Comments
Under review at npj Digital Medicine