Randomly Assigned First Differences?
Abstract
We consider treatment-effect estimation using a first-difference regression of an outcome evolution on a treatment evolution . Under a causal model in levels with a time-varying effect, the regression residual is a function of the period-one treatment . Then, researchers should test if and are correlated: if they are, the regression may suffer from an omitted variable bias. To solve it, researchers may control nonparametrically for . We use our results to revisit first-difference regressions estimated on the data of \cite{acemoglu2016import}, who study the effect of imports from China on US employment. and are strongly correlated, thus implying that first-difference regressions may be biased if the effect of Chinese imports changes over time. The coefficient on is no longer significant when controlling for .
Cite
@article{arxiv.2411.03208,
title = {Randomly Assigned First Differences?},
author = {Facundo Argañaraz and Clément de Chaisemartin and Ziteng Lei},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.03208},
year = {2025}
}