English

Randomly Assigned First Differences?

Econometrics 2025-07-04 v7

Abstract

We consider treatment-effect estimation using a first-difference regression of an outcome evolution ΔY\Delta Y on a treatment evolution ΔD\Delta D. Under a causal model in levels with a time-varying effect, the regression residual is a function of the period-one treatment D1D_{1}. Then, researchers should test if ΔD\Delta D and D1D_{1} are correlated: if they are, the regression may suffer from an omitted variable bias. To solve it, researchers may control nonparametrically for E(ΔDD1)E(\Delta D|D_{1}). We use our results to revisit first-difference regressions estimated on the data of \cite{acemoglu2016import}, who study the effect of imports from China on US employment. ΔD\Delta D and D1D_{1} are strongly correlated, thus implying that first-difference regressions may be biased if the effect of Chinese imports changes over time. The coefficient on ΔD\Delta D is no longer significant when controlling for E(ΔDD1)E(\Delta D|D_{1}).

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2411.03208,
  title  = {Randomly Assigned First Differences?},
  author = {Facundo Argañaraz and Clément de Chaisemartin and Ziteng Lei},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.03208},
  year   = {2025}
}
R2 v1 2026-06-28T19:49:05.788Z