English

Random MAX SAT, Random MAX CUT, and Their Phase Transitions

Combinatorics 2016-09-07 v2 Probability

Abstract

Given a 2-SAT formula FF consisting of nn variables and \cn\cn random clauses, what is the largest number of clauses maxF\max F satisfiable by a single assignment of the variables? We bound the answer away from the trivial bounds of (3/4)cn(3/4)cn and cncn. We prove that for c<1c<1, the expected number of clauses satisfiable is \cnΘ(1/n)\cn-\Theta(1/n); for large cc, it is ((3/4)c+Θ(c))n((3/4)c + \Theta(\sqrt{c}))n; for c=1+\epsc = 1+\eps, it is at least (1+\epsO(\eps3))n(1+\eps-O(\eps^3))n and at most (1+\epsΩ(\eps3/ln\eps))n(1+\eps-\Omega(\eps^3/\ln \eps))n; and in the ``scaling window'' c=1+Θ(n1/3)c= 1+\Theta(n^{-1/3}), it is cnΘ(1)cn-\Theta(1). In particular, just as the decision problem undergoes a phase transition, our optimization problem also undergoes a phase transition at the same critical value c=1c=1. Nearly all of our results are established without reference to the analogous propositions for decision 2-SAT, and as a byproduct we reproduce many of those results, including much of what is known about the 2-SAT scaling window. We consider ``online'' versions of MAX-2-SAT, and show that for one version, the obvious greedy algorithm is optimal. We can extend only our simplest MAX-2-SAT results to MAX-k-SAT, but we conjecture a ``MAX-k-SAT limiting function conjecture'' analogous to the folklore satisfiability threshold conjecture, but open even for k=2k=2. Neither conjecture immediately implies the other, but it is natural to further conjecture a connection between them. Finally, for random MAXCUT (the size of a maximum cut in a sparse random graph) we prove analogous results.

Cite

@article{arxiv.math/0306047,
  title  = {Random MAX SAT, Random MAX CUT, and Their Phase Transitions},
  author = {Don Coppersmith and David Gamarnik and Mohammad Hajiaghayi and Gregory B. Sorkin},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:math/0306047},
  year   = {2016}
}

Comments

49 pages