English

Ramsey Theory and Bounding in Arithmetic

Logic 2026-04-02 v2

Abstract

We explore the relation between various versions of Ramsey theorem and bounding schemes in model N{N} of a fragment of arithmetic FF. Our goal is to recast, in a different framework, and extend some results of Hirst \cite{Hirst-1987}, see Theorem 1. We will extract Weihrauch reductions from Hirst's and similar proofs. Our results, informally stated in the our terminology, all inside N{N}, follow: First the following are equivalent: BΣ2B\Sigma_2, the finite union of finite c.e.\ sets is finite, and Infinite Pigeonhole Principle, see Theorem 3. We also discuss the Weihrauch relations between these logically equivalent principles, see Section 4. The Infinite Pigeonhole Principle is Weihrauch reducible to RT22RT^2_2, see Theorem 4. There are also another principle logically equivalent to BΣ2B\Sigma_2 which is Weihrauch reducible to SRT22SRT^2_2, see Theorem 5. We show that there is a principle which is equivalent with BΣ3B\Sigma_3, see Theorem 6, and Weihrauch reducible to SRT<2SRT^2_{<\infty}, Theorem 7. We discuss some equivalencies with BΣn1B\Sigma_{n-1}, see Subsection 6.1, and then end with a problem Weihrauch reducible to RT2n+1RT^{n+1}_{2}, Subsection 6.2. The reader should be aware since we working within N{N} many of the standard definitions need to be adjusted to work. Due to the expository nature of this short paper, these definitions are sprinkled throughout the paper. A quick read of the paper from start to finish will provide a better understanding of the ideas involved rather than a careful reading of theorems.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2603.23704,
  title  = {Ramsey Theory and Bounding in Arithmetic},
  author = {Peter Cholak},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.23704},
  year   = {2026}
}

Comments

This version has some minor changes

R2 v1 2026-07-01T11:36:19.529Z