"Quantum mysteries for anyone," or classical verities for everyone?
Quantum Physics
2007-05-23 v4
Abstract
Unarticulated, implicit hypotheses in Bell's analysis of Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen (EPR) correlations are identified and examined. These relate to the mathematical-analytical properties of random variables, the character of the relevant sample spaces and physical interpretations. We shown that continuous hidden variables are not precluded by Bell inequalities. Finally, we propose a local realistic model of optical EPRB experiments and consider its implications.
Cite
@article{arxiv.quant-ph/0007101,
title = {"Quantum mysteries for anyone," or classical verities for everyone?},
author = {A. F. Kracklauer and N. A. Kracklauer},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:quant-ph/0007101},
year = {2007}
}
Comments
10 pages LaTeX v2: Noted additional flaw in Bell's Theorem + wordsmithing v 3: Moderate revamp with argument tuning; v4 edit + new EPR model