English

Pushing automated morphological classifications to their limits with the Dark Energy Survey

Astrophysics of Galaxies 2021-03-17 v2 Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics

Abstract

We present morphological classifications of \sim27 million galaxies from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Data Release 1 (DR1) using a supervised deep learning algorithm. The classification scheme separates: (a) early-type galaxies (ETGs) from late-types (LTGs); and (b) face-on galaxies from edge-on. Our Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) are trained on a small subset of DES objects with previously known classifications. These typically have mr17.7 mag\mathrm{m}_r \lesssim 17.7~\mathrm{mag}; we model fainter objects to mr<21.5\mathrm{m}_r < 21.5 mag by simulating what the brighter objects with well determined classifications would look like if they were at higher redshifts. The CNNs reach 97\% accuracy to mr<21.5\mathrm{m}_r<21.5 on their training sets, suggesting that they are able to recover features more accurately than the human eye. We then used the trained CNNs to classify the vast majority of the other DES images. The final catalog comprises five independent CNN predictions for each classification scheme, helping to determine if the CNN predictions are robust or not. We obtain secure classifications for \sim 87\% and 73\% of the catalog for the ETG vs. LTG and edge-on vs. face-on models, respectively. Combining the two classifications (a) and (b) helps to increase the purity of the ETG sample and to identify edge-on lenticular galaxies (as ETGs with high ellipticity). Where a comparison is possible, our classifications correlate very well with S\'ersic index (\textit{n}), ellipticity (ϵ\epsilon) and spectral type, even for the fainter galaxies. This is the largest multi-band catalog of automated galaxy morphologies to date.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2012.07858,
  title  = {Pushing automated morphological classifications to their limits with the Dark Energy Survey},
  author = {J. Vega-Ferrero and H. Domínguez Sánchez and M. Bernardi and M. Huertas-Company and R. Morgan and B. Margalef and M. Aguena and S. Allam and J. Annis and S. Avila and D. Bacon and E. Bertin and D. Brooks and A. Carnero Rosell and M. Carrasco Kind and J. Carretero and A. Choi and C. Conselice and M. Costanzi and L. N. da Costa and M. E. S. Pereira and J. De Vicente and S. Desai and I. Ferrero and P. Fosalba and J. Frieman and J. García-Bellido and D. Gruen and R. A. Gruendl and J. Gschwend and G. Gutierrez and W. G. Hartley and S. R. Hinton and D. L. Hollowood and K. Honscheid and B. Hoyle and M. Jarvis and A. G. Kim and K. Kuehn and N. Kuropatkin and M. Lima and M. A. G. Maia and F. Menanteau and R. Miquel and R. L. C. Ogando and A. Palmese and F. Paz-Chinchón and A. A. Plazas and A. K. Romer and E. Sanchez and V. Scarpine and M. Schubnell and S. Serrano and I. Sevilla-Noarbe and M. Smith and E. Suchyta and M. E. C. Swanson and G. Tarle and F. Tarsitano and C. To and D. L. Tucker and T. N. Varga and R. D. Wilkinson},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.07858},
  year   = {2021}
}

Comments

Accepted for publication in MNRAS (2021 February 22); 17 pages, 16 figures