English

Galaxy Morphological Classification Catalogue of the Dark Energy Survey Year 3 data with Convolutional Neural Networks

Astrophysics of Galaxies 2021-08-04 v1

Abstract

We present in this paper one of the largest galaxy morphological classification catalogues to date, including over 20 million of galaxies, using the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 3 data based on Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN). Monochromatic ii-band DES images with linear, logarithmic, and gradient scales, matched with debiased visual classifications from the Galaxy Zoo 1 (GZ1) catalogue, are used to train our CNN models. With a training set including bright galaxies (16i<1816\le{i}<18) at low redshift (z<0.25z<0.25), we furthermore investigate the limit of the accuracy of our predictions applied to galaxies at fainter magnitude and at higher redshifts. Our final catalogue covers magnitudes 16i<2116\le{i}<21, and redshifts z<1.0z<1.0, and provides predicted probabilities to two galaxy types -- Ellipticals and Spirals (disk galaxies). Our CNN classifications reveal an accuracy of over 99\% for bright galaxies when comparing with the GZ1 classifications (i<18i<18). For fainter galaxies, the visual classification carried out by three of the co-authors shows that the CNN classifier correctly categorises disky galaxies with rounder and blurred features, which humans often incorrectly visually classify as Ellipticals. As a part of the validation, we carry out one of the largest examination of non-parametric methods, including \sim100,000 galaxies with the same coverage of magnitude and redshift as the training set from our catalogue. We find that the Gini coefficient is the best single parameter discriminator between Ellipticals and Spirals for this data set.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2107.10210,
  title  = {Galaxy Morphological Classification Catalogue of the Dark Energy Survey Year 3 data with Convolutional Neural Networks},
  author = {Ting-Yun Cheng and Christopher J. Conselice and Alfonso Aragón-Salamanca and M. Aguena and S. Allam and F. Andrade-Oliveira and J. Annis and A. F. L. Bluck and D. Brooks and D. L. Burke and M. Carrasco Kind and J. Carretero and A. Choi and M. Costanzi and L. N. da Costa and M. E. S. Pereira and J. De Vicente and H. T. Diehl and A. Drlica-Wagner and K. Eckert and S. Everett and A. E. Evrard and I. Ferrero and P. Fosalba and J. Frieman and J. García-Bellido and D. W. Gerdes and T. Giannantonio and D. Gruen and R. A. Gruendl and J. Gschwend and G. Gutierrez and S. R. Hinton and D. L. Hollowood and K. Honscheid and D. J. James and E. Krause and K. Kuehn and N. Kuropatkin and O. Lahav and M. A. G. Maia and M. March and F. Menanteau and R. Miquel and R. Morgan and F. Paz-Chinchón and A. Pieres and A. A. Plazas Malagón and A. Roodman and E. Sanchez and V. Scarpine and S. Serrano and I. Sevilla-Noarbe and M. Smith and M. Soares-Santos and E. Suchyta and M. E. C. Swanson and G. Tarle and D. Thomas and C. To},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.10210},
  year   = {2021}
}

Comments

23 pages, 15 figures. Accepted by MNRAS