English

Prime numbers in logarithmic intervals

Number Theory 2013-02-14 v1

Abstract

Let XX be a large parameter. We will first give a new estimate for the integral moments of primes in short intervals of the type (p,p+h](p,p+h], where pXp\leq X is a prime number and h=\odiXh=\odi{X}. Then we will apply this to prove that for every λ>1/2\lambda>1/2 there exists a positive proportion of primes pXp\leq X such that the interval (p,p+λlogX](p,p+ \lambda\log X] contains at least a prime number. As a consequence we improve Cheer and Goldston's result on the size of real numbers λ>1\lambda>1 with the property that there is a positive proportion of integers mXm\leq X such that the interval (m,m+λlogX](m,m+ \lambda\log X] contains no primes. We also prove other results concerning the moments of the gaps between consecutive primes and about the positive proportion of integers mXm\leq X such that the interval (m,m+λlogX](m,m+ \lambda\log X] contains at least a prime number. The last application of these techniques are two theorems (the first one unconditional and the second one in which we assume the validity of the Riemann Hypothesis and of a form of the Montgomery pair correlation conjecture) on the positive proportion of primes pXp\leq X such that the interval (p,p+λlogX](p,p+ \lambda\log X] contains no primes.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.0809.2967,
  title  = {Prime numbers in logarithmic intervals},
  author = {D. Bazzanella and A. Languasco and A. Zaccagnini},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:0809.2967},
  year   = {2013}
}

Comments

17 pages

R2 v1 2026-06-21T11:21:14.476Z