English

Optical coherence and teleportation: Why a laser is a clock, not a quantum channel

Quantum Physics 2009-11-10 v1

Abstract

It has been argued [T. Rudolph and B.C. Sanders, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 87}, 077903 (2001)] that continuous-variable quantum teleportation at optical frequencies has not been achieved because the source used (a laser) was not `truly coherent'. Van Enk, and Fuchs [Phys. Rev. Lett, {\bf 88}, 027902 (2002)], while arguing against Rudolph and Sanders, also accept that an `absolute phase' is achievable, even if it has not been achieved yet. I will argue to the contrary that `true coherence' or `absolute phase' is always illusory, as the concept of absolute time on a scale beyond direct human experience is meaningless. All we can ever do is to use an agreed time standard. In this context, a laser beam is fundamentally as good a `clock' as any other. I explain in detail why this claim is true, and defend my argument against various objections. In the process I discuss super-selection rules, quantum channels, and the ultimate limits to the performance of a laser as a clock. For this last topic I use some earlier work by myself [Phys. Rev. A {\bf 60}, 4083 (1999)] and Berry and myself [Phys. Rev. A {\bf 65}, 043803 (2002)] to show that a Heisenberg-limited laser with a mean photon number μ\mu can synchronize MM independent clocks each with a mean-square error of M/4μ\sqrt{M}/4\mu radians2^2.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.quant-ph/0303116,
  title  = {Optical coherence and teleportation: Why a laser is a clock, not a quantum channel},
  author = {Howard M. Wiseman},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:quant-ph/0303116},
  year   = {2009}
}

Comments

14 pages, no figures, some equations this time. For proceedings of SPIE conference "Fluctuations and Noise 2003"

R2 v1 2026-07-22T19:38:43.110Z