English

On Zero Forcing Number of Functigraphs

Combinatorics 2012-05-08 v2

Abstract

\emph{Zero forcing number}, Z(G)Z(G), of a graph GG is the minimum cardinality of a set SS of black vertices (whereas vertices in V(G)SV(G) \setminus S are colored white) such that V(G)V(G) is turned black after finitely many applications of "the color-change rule": a white vertex is converted black if it is the only white neighbor of a black vertex. Zero forcing number was introduced and used to bound the minimum rank of graphs by the "AIM Minimum Rank -- Special Graphs Work Group". Let G1G_1 and G2G_2 be disjoint copies of a graph GG and let f:V(G1)V(G2)f: V(G_1) \rightarrow V(G_2) be a function. Then a \emph{functigraph} C(G,f)=(V,E)C(G, f)=(V, E) has the vertex set V=V(G1)V(G2)V=V(G_1) \cup V(G_2) and the edge set E=E(G1)E(G2){uvv=f(u)}E=E(G_1) \cup E(G_2) \cup \{uv \mid v=f(u)\}. For a connected graph GG of order n3n \ge 3, it is readily seen that 1+δ(G)Z(C(G,σ))n1+\delta(G) \le Z(C(G, \sigma)) \le n for any permutation σ\sigma; we show that 1+δ(G)Z(C(G,f))2n21+ \delta(G) \le Z(C(G, f)) \le 2n-2 for any function ff, where δ(G)\delta(G) is the minimum degree of GG. We give examples showing that there does not exist a function gg such that, for every pair (G,f)(G,f), Z(G)<g(Z(C(G,f)))Z(G)<g(Z(C(G,f))) or g(Z(G))>Z(C(G,f))g(Z(G))>Z(C(G,f)). We further investigate the zero forcing number of functigraphs on complete graphs, on cycles, and on paths.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1204.2238,
  title  = {On Zero Forcing Number of Functigraphs},
  author = {Cong X. Kang and Eunjeong Yi},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1204.2238},
  year   = {2012}
}

Comments

12 pages, 6 figures

R2 v1 2026-06-21T20:47:33.735Z