English

On the outlying eigenvalues of a polynomial in large independent random matrices

Operator Algebras 2018-11-07 v2 Probability

Abstract

Given a selfadjoint polynomial P(X,Y)P(X,Y) in two noncommuting selfadjoint indeterminates, we investigate the asymptotic eigenvalue behavior of the random matrix P(A_N,B_N)P(A\_N,B\_N), where A_NA\_N and B_NB\_N are independent Hermitian random matrices and the distribution of B_NB\_N is invariant under conjugation by unitary operators. We assume that the empirical eigenvalue distributions of A_NA\_N and B_NB\_N converge almost surely to deterministic probability measures μ\mu and ν\nu, respectively. In addition, the eigenvalues of A_NA\_N and B_NB\_N are assumed to converge uniformly almost surely to the support of μ\mu and ν,\nu, respectively, except for a fixed finite number of fixed eigenvalues (spikes) of A_NA\_N. It is known that almost surely the empirical distribution of the eigenvalues of P(A_N,B_N)P(A\_N,B\_N) converges to a certain deterministic probability measure η\eta (sometimes denoted η=P(μ,ν)\eta=P^\square(\mu,\nu)) and, when there are no spikes, the eigenvalues of P(A_N,B_N)P(A\_N,B\_N) converge uniformly almost surely to the support of η\eta. When spikes are present, we show that the eigenvalues of P(A_N,B_N)P(A\_N,B\_N) still converge uniformly to the support of η\eta, with the possible exception of certain isolated outliers whose location can be determined in terms of μ,ν,P\mu,\nu,P, and the spikes of A_NA\_N. We establish a similar result when B_NB\_N is replaced by a Wigner matrix. The relation between outliers and spikes is described using the operator-valued subordination functions of free probability theory. These results extend known facts from the special case in which P(X,Y)=X+YP(X,Y)=X+Y.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1703.08102,
  title  = {On the outlying eigenvalues of a polynomial in large independent random matrices},
  author = {Serban Belinschi and Hari Bercovici and Mireille Capitaine},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.08102},
  year   = {2018}
}

Comments

Second version. Comments are welcome