English

On the multi-wavelength Emission from CTA 102

High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena 2018-08-22 v1

Abstract

We report on broadband observations of CTA 102 (z=1.037z=1.037) during the active states in 2016-2017. In the γ\gamma-ray band, Fermi LAT observed several prominent flares which followed a harder-when-brighter behavior: the hardest photon index Γ=1.61±0.10\Gamma=1.61\pm 0.10 being unusual for FSRQs. The peak γ\gamma-ray flux above 100 MeV (3.55±0.55)×105photoncm2s1(3.55\pm0.55)\times10^{-5}\:{\rm photon\:cm^{-2}\:s^{-1}} observed on MJD 57738.47 within 4.31 minutes, corresponds to an isotropic γ\gamma-ray luminosity of Lγ=3.25×1050ergs1L_{\gamma}=3.25\times10^{50}\:{\rm erg\:s^{-1}}, comparable with the highest values observed from blazars so far. The analyses of the Swift UVOT/XRT data show an increase in the UV/optical and X-ray bands which is contemporaneous with the bright γ\gamma-ray periods. The X-ray spectrum observed by Swift XRT and NuSTAR during the γ\gamma-ray flaring period is characterized by a hard photon index of 1.30\sim1.30. The shortest e-folding time was 4.08±1.444.08\pm1.44 hours, suggesting a very compact emission region Rδ×2.16×1014R\leq\delta\times2.16\times10^{14} cm. We modeled the spectral energy distribution of CTA 102 in several periods (having different properties in UV/optical, X-ray and γ\gamma-ray bands) assuming a compact blob inside and outside the BLR. We found that the high-energy data are better described when the infrared thermal radiation of the dusty torus is considered. In the flaring periods when the correlation between the γ\gamma-ray and UV/optical/X-ray bands is lacking, the γ\gamma-ray emission can be produced from the interaction of fresh electrons in a different blob, which does not make a dominant contribution at lower energies.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1807.02869,
  title  = {On the multi-wavelength Emission from CTA 102},
  author = {S. Gasparyan and N. Sahakyan and V. Baghmanyan and D. Zargaryan},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.02869},
  year   = {2018}
}

Comments

Accepted for publication in ApJ

R2 v1 2026-06-23T02:54:10.676Z