On Nested Justification Systems (full version)
Abstract
Justification theory is a general framework for the definition of semantics of rule-based languages that has a high explanatory potential. Nested justification systems, first introduced by Denecker et al. (2015), allow for the composition of justification systems. This notion of nesting thus enables the modular definition of semantics of rule-based languages, and increases the representational capacities of justification theory. As we show in this paper, the original semantics for nested justification systems lead to the loss of information relevant for explanations. In view of this problem, we provide an alternative characterization of semantics of nested justification systems and show that this characterization is equivalent to the original semantics. Furthermore, we show how nested justification systems allow representing fixpoint definitions (Hou and Denecker 2009).
Cite
@article{arxiv.2205.04541,
title = {On Nested Justification Systems (full version)},
author = {Simon Marynissen and Jesse Heyninck and Bart Bogaerts and Marc Denecker},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.04541},
year = {2022}
}
Comments
Paper presented at the 38th International Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP 2022), 16 pages