English

On a Problem of Steinhaus

Number Theory 2023-12-05 v2 Combinatorics

Abstract

Let NN be a positive integer. A sequence X=(x1,x2,,xN)X=(x_1,x_2,\ldots,x_N) of points in the unit interval [0,1)[0,1) is piercing if {x1,x2,,xn}[in,i+1n)\{x_1,x_2,\ldots,x_n\}\cap \left[\frac{i}{n},\frac{i+1}{n} \right) \neq\emptyset holds for every n=1,2,,Nn=1,2,\ldots, N and every i=0,1,,n1i=0,1,\ldots,n-1. In 1958 Steinhaus asked whether piercing sequences can be arbitrarily long. A negative answer was provided by Schinzel, who proved that any such sequence may have at most 7474 elements. This was later improved to the best possible value of 1717 by Warmus, and independently by Berlekamp and Graham. In this paper we study a more general variant of piercing sequences. Let f(n)nf(n)\geq n be an infinite nondecreasing sequence of positive integers. A sequence X=(x1,x2,,xf(N))X=(x_1,x_2,\ldots,x_{f(N)}) is ff-piercing if {x1,x2,,xf(n)}[in,i+1n)\{x_1,x_2,\ldots,x_{f(n)}\}\cap \left[\frac{i}{n},\frac{i+1}{n} \right) \neq\emptyset holds for every n=1,2,,Nn=1,2,\ldots, N and every i=0,1,,n1i=0,1,\ldots,n-1. A special case of f(n)=n+df(n)=n+d, with dd a fixed nonnegative integer, was studied by Berlekamp and Graham. They noticed that for each d0d\geq 0, the maximum length of any (n+d)(n+d)-piercing sequence is finite. Expressing this maximum length as s(d)+ds(d)+d, they obtained an exponential upper bound on the function s(d)s(d), which was later improved to s(d)=O(d3)s(d)=O(d^3) by Graham and Levy. Recently, Konyagin proved that 2ds(d)<200d2d\leqslant s(d)< 200d holds for all sufficiently big dd. Using a different technique based on the Farey fractions and stick-breaking games, we prove here that the function s(d)s(d) satisfies c1ds(d)c2d+o(d)\left\lfloor{}c_1d\right\rfloor{}\leqslant s(d)\leqslant c_2d+o(d), where c1=ln21ln22.25c_1=\frac{\ln 2}{1-\ln 2}\approx2.25 and c2=1+ln21ln25.52c_2=\frac{1+\ln2}{1-\ln2}\approx5.52. We also prove that there exists an infinite ff-piercing sequence with f(n)=γn+o(n)f(n)= \gamma n+o(n) if and only if γ1ln21.44\gamma\geq\frac{1}{\ln 2}\approx 1.44.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2111.01887,
  title  = {On a Problem of Steinhaus},
  author = {Marcin Anholcer and Bartłomiej Bosek and Jarosław Grytczuk and Grzegorz Gutowski and Jakub Przybyło and Rafał Pyzik and Mariusz Zając},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.01887},
  year   = {2023}
}

Comments

16 pages

R2 v1 2026-06-24T07:23:26.483Z