Observability inequality, log-type Hausdorff content and heat equations
Abstract
This paper studies observability inequalities for heat equations on both bounded domains and the whole space . The observation sets are measured by log-type Hausdorff contents, which are induced by certain log-type gauge functions closely related to the heat kernel. On a bounded domain, we derive the observability inequality for observation sets of positive log-type Hausdorff content. Notably, the aforementioned inequality holds not only for all sets with Hausdorff dimension for any , but also for certain sets of Hausdorff dimension . On the whole space , we establish the observability inequality for observation sets that are thick at the scale of the log-type Hausdorff content. Furthermore, we prove that for the 1-dimensional heat equation on an interval, the Hausdorff content we have chosen is an optimal scale for the observability inequality. To obtain these observability inequalities, we use the adapted Lebeau-Robiano strategy from \cite{Duyckaerts2012resolvent}. For this purpose, we prove the following results at scale of the log-type Hausdorff content, the former being derived from the latter: We establish a spectral inequality/a Logvinenko-Sereda uncertainty principle; we set up a quantitative propagation of smallness of analytic functions; we build up a Remez' inequality; and more fundamentally, we provide an upper bound for the log-type Hausdorff content of a set where a monic polynomial is small, based on an estimate in Lubinsky \cite{Lubinsky1997small}, which is ultimately traced back to the classical Cartan Lemma. In addition, we set up a capacity-based slicing lemma (related to the log-type gauge functions) and establish a quantitative relationship between Hausdorff contents and capacities. These tools are crucial in the studies of the aforementioned propagation of smallness in high-dimensional situations.
Cite
@article{arxiv.2411.11573,
title = {Observability inequality, log-type Hausdorff content and heat equations},
author = {Shanlin Huang and Gengsheng Wang and Ming Wang},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.11573},
year = {2024}
}
Comments
56pages, we have corrected the proof of Proposition 5.17