English

Hausdorff dimension of caloric measure

Classical Analysis and ODEs 2023-07-13 v2 Analysis of PDEs

Abstract

We examine caloric measures ω\omega on general domains in Rn+1=Rn×R\mathbb{R}^{n+1} = \mathbb{R}^n\times\mathbb{R} (space ×\times time) from the perspective of geometric measure theory. On one hand, we give a direct proof of a consequence of a theorem of Taylor and Watson (1985) that the lower parabolic Hausdorff dimension of ω\omega is at least nn and ωHn\omega \ll \mathcal{H}^n. On the other hand, we prove that the upper parabolic Hausdorff dimension of ω\omega is at most n+2βnn+2-\beta_n, where βn>0\beta_n > 0 depends only on nn. Analogous bounds for harmonic measures were first shown by Nevanlinna (1934) and Bourgain (1987). Heuristically, we show that the density of obstacles in a cube needed to make it unlikely that a Brownian motion started outside of the cube exits a domain near the center of the cube must be chosen according to the ambient dimension. In the course of the proof, we give a caloric measure analogue of Bourgain's alternative: for any constants 0<ϵnδ<1/20 < \epsilon \ll_n \delta < 1/2 and closed set ERn+1E \subset \mathbb{R}^{n+1}, either (i) EQE \cap Q has relatively large caloric measure in QEQ \setminus E for every pole in FF or (ii) EQE \cap Q_* has relatively small ρ\rho-dimensional parabolic Hausdorff content for every n<ρn+2n < \rho \leq n+2, where QQ is a cube, FF is a subcube of QQ aligned at the center of the top time-face, and QQ_* is a subcube of QQ that is close to, but separated backwards-in-time from FF: Q=(1/2,1/2)n×(1,0),F=[1/2+δ,1/2δ]n×[ϵ2,0),Q = (-1/2,1/2)^n \times (-1,0), \quad F = [-1/2+\delta,1/2-\delta]^n\times[-\epsilon^2,0), andQ=[1/2+δ,1/2δ]n×[3ϵ2,2ϵ2].\text{and}\quad Q_* = [-1/2+\delta,1/2-\delta]^n\times[-3\epsilon^2,-2\epsilon^2]. Further, we supply a version of the strong Markov property for caloric measures.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2108.12340,
  title  = {Hausdorff dimension of caloric measure},
  author = {Matthew Badger and Alyssa Genschaw},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.12340},
  year   = {2023}
}

Comments

34 pages, 5 figures (v2: corrected statement of Theorem 2.13, deleted Remark 5.4, added references to upper and lower bounds on b_3, integrated footnotes into main text to conform to journal style)