Must a primitive non-deficient number have a component not much larger than its radical?
Number Theory
2024-12-12 v3
Abstract
Let be a primitive non-deficient number where where are distinct primes. We prove that there exists an such that We conjecture that in fact one can always find an such that .
Cite
@article{arxiv.2005.12115,
title = {Must a primitive non-deficient number have a component not much larger than its radical?},
author = {Joshua Zelinsky},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.12115},
year = {2024}
}
Comments
8 pages. This version tighter bounds than the first version due to a suggestion by Jan-Christoph Schlage-Puchta