English

Multiplicity results in the non-coercive case for an elliptic problem with critical growth in the gradient

Analysis of PDEs 2015-09-22 v2

Abstract

We consider the boundary value problem \begin{equation} - \Delta u = \lambda c(x)u+ \mu(x) |\nabla u|^2 + h(x), \qquad u \in H^1_0(\Omega) \cap L^{\infty}(\Omega), \leqno{(P_{\lambda})} \end{equation} where ΩRN,N3\Omega \subset \R^N, N \geq 3 is a bounded domain with smooth boundary. It is assumed that c0c\gneqq 0, c,hc,h belong to Lp(Ω)L^p(\Omega) for some p>Np > N. Also μL(Ω)\mu \in L^{\infty}(\Omega) and μμ1>0\mu \geq \mu_1 >0 for some μ1R\mu_1 \in \R. It is known that when λ0\lambda \leq 0, problem (Pλ)(P_{\lambda}) has at most one solution. In this paper we study, under various assumptions, the structure of the set of solutions of (Pλ)(P_{\lambda}) assuming that λ>0\lambda>0. Our study unveils the rich structure of this problem. We show, in particular, that what happen for λ=0\lambda=0 influences the set of solutions in all the half-space ]0,+[×(H01(Ω)L(Ω))]0,+\infty[\times(H^1_0(\Omega) \cap L^{\infty}(\Omega)). Most of our results are valid without assuming that hh has a sign. If we require hh to have a sign, we observe that the set of solutions differs completely for h0h\gneqq 0 and h0h\lneqq 0. We also show when hh has a sign that solutions not having this sign may exists. Some uniqueness results of signed solutions are also derived. The paper ends with a list of open problems.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1507.04880,
  title  = {Multiplicity results in the non-coercive case for an elliptic problem with critical growth in the gradient},
  author = {Colette De Coster and Louis Jeanjean},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1507.04880},
  year   = {2015}
}