English

Multi-Messenger Gravitational Wave Searches with Pulsar Timing Arrays: Application to 3C66B Using the NANOGrav 11-year Data Set

Astrophysics of Galaxies 2020-08-13 v2 Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics

Abstract

When galaxies merge, the supermassive black holes in their centers may form binaries and, during the process of merger, emit low-frequency gravitational radiation in the process. In this paper we consider the galaxy 3C66B, which was used as the target of the first multi-messenger search for gravitational waves. Due to the observed periodicities present in the photometric and astrometric data of the source of the source, it has been theorized to contain a supermassive black hole binary. Its apparent 1.05-year orbital period would place the gravitational wave emission directly in the pulsar timing band. Since the first pulsar timing array study of 3C66B, revised models of the source have been published, and timing array sensitivities and techniques have improved dramatically. With these advances, we further constrain the chirp mass of the potential supermassive black hole binary in 3C66B to less than (1.65±0.02)×109 M(1.65\pm0.02) \times 10^9~{M_\odot} using data from the NANOGrav 11-year data set. This upper limit provides a factor of 1.6 improvement over previous limits, and a factor of 4.3 over the first search done. Nevertheless, the most recent orbital model for the source is still consistent with our limit from pulsar timing array data. In addition, we are able to quantify the improvement made by the inclusion of source properties gleaned from electromagnetic data to `blind' pulsar timing array searches. With these methods, it is apparent that it is not necessary to obtain exact a priori knowledge of the period of a binary to gain meaningful astrophysical inferences.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2005.07123,
  title  = {Multi-Messenger Gravitational Wave Searches with Pulsar Timing Arrays: Application to 3C66B Using the NANOGrav 11-year Data Set},
  author = {Zaven Arzoumanian and Paul T. Baker and Adam Brazier and Paul R. Brook and Sarah Burke-Spolaor and Bence Becsy and Maria Charisi and Shami Chatterjee and James M. Cordes and Neil J. Cornish and Fronefield Crawford and H. Thankful Cromartie and Kathryn Crowter and Megan E. DeCesar and Paul B. Demorest and Timothy Dolch and Rodney D. Elliott and Justin A. Ellis and Robert D. Ferdman and Elizabeth C. Ferrara and Emmanuel Fonseca and Nathan Garver-Daniels and Peter A. Gentile and Deborah C. Good and Jeffrey S. Hazboun and Kristina Islo and Ross J. Jennings and Megan L. Jones and Andrew R. Kaiser and David L. Kaplan and Luke Zoltan Kelley and Joey Shapiro Key and Michael T. Lam and T. Joseph W. Lazio and Lina Levin and Jing Luo and Ryan S. Lynch and Dustin R. Madison and Maura A. McLaughlin and Chiara M. F. Mingarelli and Cherry Ng and David J. Nice and Timothy T. Pennucci and Nihan S. Pol and Scott M. Ransom and Paul S. Ray and Brent J. Shapiro-Albert and Xavier Siemens and Joseph Simon and Renee Spiewak and Ingrid H. Stairs and Daniel R. Stinebring and Kevin Stovall and Joseph K. Swiggum and Stephen R. Taylor and Michele Vallisneri and Sarah J. Vigeland and Caitlin A. Witt and Weiwei Zhu},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.07123},
  year   = {2020}
}

Comments

14 pages, 6 figures. Accepted by ApJ