English

The NANOGrav 11-Year Data Set: Limits on Gravitational Wave Memory

High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena 2020-02-05 v2 General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology

Abstract

The mergers of supermassive black hole binaries (SMBHBs) promise to be incredible sources of gravitational waves (GWs). While the oscillatory part of the merger gravitational waveform will be outside the frequency sensitivity range of pulsar timing arrays (PTAs), the non-oscillatory GW memory effect is detectable. Further, any burst of gravitational waves will produce GW memory, making memory a useful probe of unmodeled exotic sources and new physics. We searched the North American Nanohertz Observatory for Gravitational Waves (NANOGrav) 11-year data set for GW memory. This dataset is sensitive to very low frequency GWs of 3\sim3 to 400400 nHz (periods of 11\sim11 yr - 11 mon). Finding no evidence for GWs, we placed limits on the strain amplitude of GW memory events during the observation period. We then used the strain upper limits to place limits on the rate of GW memory causing events. At a strain of 2.5×10142.5\times10^{-14}, corresponding to the median upper limit as a function of source sky position, we set a limit on the rate of GW memory events at <0.4<0.4 yr1^{-1}. That strain corresponds to a SMBHB merger with reduced mass of ηM2×1010M\eta M \sim 2\times10^{10}M_\odot and inclination of ι=π/3\iota=\pi/3 at a distance of 1 Gpc. As a test of our analysis, we analyzed the NANOGrav 9-year data set as well. This analysis found an anomolous signal, which does not appear in the 11-year data set. This signal is not a GW, and its origin remains unknown.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1911.08488,
  title  = {The NANOGrav 11-Year Data Set: Limits on Gravitational Wave Memory},
  author = {K. Aggarwal and Z. Arzoumanian and P. T. Baker and A. Brazier and P. R. Brook and S. Burke-Spolaor and S. Chatterjee and J. M. Cordes and N. J. Cornish and F. Crawford and H. T. Cromartie and K. Crowter and M. Decesar and P. B. Demorest and T. Dolch and J. A. Ellis and R. D. Ferdman and E. C. Ferrara and E. Fonseca and N. Garver-Daniels and P. Gentile and D. Good and J. S. Hazboun and A. M. Holgado and E. A. Huerta and K. Islo and R. Jennings and G. Jones and M. L. Jones and D. L. Kaplan and L. Z. Kelley and J. S. Key and M. T. Lam and T. J. W. Lazio and L. Levin and D. R. Lorimer and J. Luo and R. S. Lynch and D. R. Madison and M. A. McLaughlin and S. T. McWilliams and C. M. F. Mingarelli and C. Ng and D. J. Nice and T. T. Pennucci and N. S. Pol and S. M. Ransom and P. S. Ray and X. Siemens and J. Simon and R. Spiewak and I. H. Stairs and D. R. Stinebring and K. Stovall and J. K. Swiggum and S. R. Taylor and M. Vallisneri and R. Van Haasterer and S. J. Vigeland and C. A. Witt and W. W. Zhu},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.08488},
  year   = {2020}
}

Comments

10 pages, 6 figures, submitted to ApJ

R2 v1 2026-06-23T12:21:10.897Z