English

Mind the Independence Gap

Combinatorics 2018-12-14 v1 Computational Complexity Discrete Mathematics Data Structures and Algorithms

Abstract

The independence gap of a graph was introduced by Ekim et al. (2018) as a measure of how far a graph is from being well-covered. It is defined as the difference between the maximum and minimum size of a maximal independent set. We investigate the independence gap of a graph from structural and algorithmic points of view, with a focus on classes of perfect graphs. Generalizing results on well-covered graphs due to Dean and Zito (1994) and Hujdurovi\'c et al. (2018), we express the independence gap of a perfect graph in terms of clique partitions and use this characterization to develop a polynomial-time algorithm for recognizing graphs of constant independence gap in any class of perfect graphs of bounded clique number. Next, we introduce a hereditary variant of the parameter, which we call hereditary independence gap and which measures the maximum independence gap over all induced subgraphs of the graph. We show that determining whether a given graph has hereditary independence gap at most kk is polynomial-time solvable if kk is fixed and co-NP-complete if kk is part of input. We also investigate the complexity of the independent set problem in graph classes related to independence gap, showing that the problem is NP-complete in the class of graphs of independence gap at most one and polynomial-time solvable in any class of graphs with bounded hereditary independence gap. Combined with some known results on claw-free graphs, our results imply that the independent domination problem is solvable in polynomial time in the class of {\{claw, 2P3}P_3\}-free graphs.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1812.05316,
  title  = {Mind the Independence Gap},
  author = {Tınaz Ekim and Didem Gözüpek and Ademir Hujdurović and Martin Milanič},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.05316},
  year   = {2018}
}
R2 v1 2026-06-23T06:41:10.510Z