Measuring the robustness of Gaussian processes to kernel choice
Abstract
Gaussian processes (GPs) are used to make medical and scientific decisions, including in cardiac care and monitoring of atmospheric carbon dioxide levels. Notably, the choice of GP kernel is often somewhat arbitrary. In particular, uncountably many kernels typically align with qualitative prior knowledge (e.g.\ function smoothness or stationarity). But in practice, data analysts choose among a handful of convenient standard kernels (e.g.\ squared exponential). In the present work, we ask: Would decisions made with a GP differ under other, qualitatively interchangeable kernels? We show how to answer this question by solving a constrained optimization problem over a finite-dimensional space. We can then use standard optimizers to identify substantive changes in relevant decisions made with a GP. We demonstrate in both synthetic and real-world examples that decisions made with a GP can exhibit non-robustness to kernel choice, even when prior draws are qualitatively interchangeable to a user.
Cite
@article{arxiv.2106.06510,
title = {Measuring the robustness of Gaussian processes to kernel choice},
author = {William T. Stephenson and Soumya Ghosh and Tin D. Nguyen and Mikhail Yurochkin and Sameer K. Deshpande and Tamara Broderick},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.06510},
year = {2022}
}
Comments
AISTATS 2022