Magic state cultivation: growing T states as cheap as CNOT gates
Abstract
We refine ideas from Knill 1996, Jones 2016, Chamberland 2020, Gidney 2023+2024, Bombin 2024, and Hirano 2024 to efficiently prepare good states. We call our construction "magic state cultivation" because it gradually grows the size and reliability of one state. Cultivation fits inside a surface code patch and uses roughly the same number of physical gates as a lattice surgery CNOT gate of equivalent reliability. We estimate the infidelity of cultivation (from injection to idling at distance 15) using a mix of state vector simulation, stabilizer simulation, error enumeration, and Monte Carlo sampling. Compared to prior work, cultivation uses an order of magnitude fewer qubit-rounds to reach logical error rates as low as when subjected to uniform depolarizing circuit noise. Halving the circuit noise to improves the achievable logical error rate to . Cultivation's efficiency and strong response to improvements in physical noise suggest that further magic state distillation may never be needed in practice.
Keywords
Cite
@article{arxiv.2409.17595,
title = {Magic state cultivation: growing T states as cheap as CNOT gates},
author = {Craig Gidney and Noah Shutty and Cody Jones},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.17595},
year = {2024}
}