English

Low-Stabilizer-Complexity Quantum States Are Not Pseudorandom

Quantum Physics 2025-09-18 v1 Computational Complexity Machine Learning

Abstract

We show that quantum states with "low stabilizer complexity" can be efficiently distinguished from Haar-random. Specifically, given an nn-qubit pure state ψ|\psi\rangle, we give an efficient algorithm that distinguishes whether ψ|\psi\rangle is (i) Haar-random or (ii) a state with stabilizer fidelity at least 1k\frac{1}{k} (i.e., has fidelity at least 1k\frac{1}{k} with some stabilizer state), promised that one of these is the case. With black-box access to ψ|\psi\rangle, our algorithm uses O ⁣(k12log(1/δ))O\!\left( k^{12} \log(1/\delta)\right) copies of ψ|\psi\rangle and O ⁣(nk12log(1/δ))O\!\left(n k^{12} \log(1/\delta)\right) time to succeed with probability at least 1δ1-\delta, and, with access to a state preparation unitary for ψ|\psi\rangle (and its inverse), O ⁣(k3log(1/δ))O\!\left( k^{3} \log(1/\delta)\right) queries and O ⁣(nk3log(1/δ))O\!\left(n k^{3} \log(1/\delta)\right) time suffice. As a corollary, we prove that ω(log(n))\omega(\log(n)) TT-gates are necessary for any Clifford+TT circuit to prepare computationally pseudorandom quantum states, a first-of-its-kind lower bound.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2209.14530,
  title  = {Low-Stabilizer-Complexity Quantum States Are Not Pseudorandom},
  author = {Sabee Grewal and Vishnu Iyer and William Kretschmer and Daniel Liang},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.14530},
  year   = {2025}
}

Comments

20 pages

R2 v1 2026-06-28T02:20:29.650Z