English

Improved Stabilizer Estimation via Bell Difference Sampling

Quantum Physics 2025-09-18 v3 Computational Complexity Data Structures and Algorithms

Abstract

We study the complexity of learning quantum states in various models with respect to the stabilizer formalism and obtain the following results: - We prove that Ω(n)\Omega(n) TT-gates are necessary for any Clifford+TT circuit to prepare computationally pseudorandom quantum states, an exponential improvement over the previously known bound. This bound is asymptotically tight if linear-time quantum-secure pseudorandom functions exist. - Given an nn-qubit pure quantum state ψ|\psi\rangle that has fidelity at least τ\tau with some stabilizer state, we give an algorithm that outputs a succinct description of a stabilizer state that witnesses fidelity at least τε\tau - \varepsilon. The algorithm uses O(n/(ε2τ4))O(n/(\varepsilon^2\tau^4)) samples and exp(O(n/τ4))/ε2\exp\left(O(n/\tau^4)\right) / \varepsilon^2 time. In the regime of τ\tau constant, this algorithm estimates stabilizer fidelity substantially faster than the na\"ive exp(O(n2))\exp(O(n^2))-time brute-force algorithm over all stabilizer states. - In the special case of τ>cos2(π/8)\tau > \cos^2(\pi/8), we show that a modification of the above algorithm runs in polynomial time. - We exhibit a tolerant property testing algorithm for stabilizer states. The underlying algorithmic primitive in all of our results is Bell difference sampling. To prove our results, we establish and/or strengthen connections between Bell difference sampling, symplectic Fourier analysis, and graph theory.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2304.13915,
  title  = {Improved Stabilizer Estimation via Bell Difference Sampling},
  author = {Sabee Grewal and Vishnu Iyer and William Kretschmer and Daniel Liang},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.13915},
  year   = {2025}
}

Comments

41 pages, 2 figures. v3: changed presentation of tolerant testing algorithm and other minor edits

R2 v1 2026-06-28T10:19:13.962Z