English

Insight into $f_0(980)$ through the $B_{(s)}$ charmed decays

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology 2016-03-30 v1

Abstract

Through analyzing the B(s)B_{(s)} charmed decays B0Dˉ0f0(980)B^{0}\to \bar D_{0}f_0(980) and BsDˉ0f0(980)B_{s}\to \bar D_{0}f_0(980) within the framework of the PQCD factorization approach and comparing with the current data, we find that there are two possible regions for the f0(980)f0(500)f_0(980)-f_0(500) mixing angle θ\theta: one is centered at 343834^\circ\sim38^\circ and the other is falls into 142154142^\circ\sim154^\circ. The former can overlap mostly with one of allowed angle regions extracted from the decay B0Dˉ0f0(500)B^{0}\to \bar D_{0}f_0(500). The branching fractions of BsB_s decay modes are less sensitive to the mixing angle compared with those of B decay modes. Especially, for the decay BsD0f0(980)B_{s}\to D^0 f_0(980), its branching fraction changes only slightly between (1.21.8)×107(1.2\sim1.8)\times10^{-7} when the mixing angle θ\theta runs from 00^\circ to 180180^\circ. All of our results support the picture that the f0(980)f_0(980) is dominated by two quark component in the B decay dynamic mechanism. Furthermore, the ssˉs\bar s component is more important than the qqˉ=(uuˉ+ddˉ)/2q\bar q=(u\bar u+d\bar d)/\sqrt{2} component. This point is different from f0(500)/σf_0(500)/\sigma. Last but not least, our picture is not in conflict with the popular four-quark explanation.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1601.04137,
  title  = {Insight into $f_0(980)$ through the $B_{(s)}$ charmed decays},
  author = {Zhi-Qing Zhang and Si-Yang Wang and Xing-Ke Ma},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1601.04137},
  year   = {2016}
}

Comments

15 pages, 4 figures