In response to the comments by Murphy et al. (arxiv:0708.3677)
Abstract
In their comment, Murphy et al. (arxiv:0708.3677) criticize the fitting procedure we used in two previous papers [Srianand et al. 2004(Paper I) and Chand et al. 2004 (Paper II)] and conclude that the above papers offers no stringent test to previous evidence for varying fine structure constant. We think this is a hasty conclusion as (a) our procedure is robust as shown in Paper II; (b) the data used by Murphy et al., in particular the error array, are different from ours and there are differences in the fitting procedure; (c) despite these differences, 70 per cent of their individual measurements are consistent with that quoted in Paper II. Our reanalysis using VPFIT with identical initial guess parameters leads to \Delta\alpha/\alpha = (0.01+/-0.15)x 10^{-5}\sigma$ level) with very little scatter (\chi^2_\nu ~1).
Keywords
Cite
@article{arxiv.0711.1742,
title = {In response to the comments by Murphy et al. (arxiv:0708.3677)},
author = {Raghunathan Srianand and Hum Chand and Patrick Petitjean and Bastien Aracil},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:0711.1742},
year = {2007}
}
Comments
To appear in PRL as a reply to the comment by Murphy et al., contains 2 figures