English

Improved test-retest reliability of $\textit{R}_2^*$ and susceptibility quantification using multi-shot multi echo 3D EPI

Medical Physics 2024-01-01 v1

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the potential of 3D echo-planar imaging (EPI) for improving the reliability of T2T_2^*-weighted (T2wT_2^*w) data and quantification of R2\textit{R}_2^* decay rate and susceptibility (χ\chi) compared to conventional gradient echo (GRE)-based acquisition. Eight healthy subjects in a wide age range were recruited. Each subject received repeated scans for both GRE and EPI acquisitions with an isotropic 1 mm resolution at 3 T. Maps of R2\textit{R}_2^* and χ\chi were quantified and compared using their inter-scan difference to evaluate the test-retest reliability. Inter-protocol differences of R2\textit{R}_2^* and χ\chi between GRE and EPI were also measured voxel by voxel and in selected ROIs to test the consistency between the two acquisition methods. The quantifications of R2\textit{R}_2^* and χ\chi using EPI protocols showed increased test-retest reliability with higher EPI factors up to 5 as performed in the experiment and were consistent with those based on GRE. This result suggested multi-shot multi-echo 3D EPI can be a useful alternative acquisition method for T2wT_2^*w MRI and quantification of R2\textit{R}_2^* and χ\chi with reduced scan time, improved test-retest reliability and similar accuracy compared to commonly used 3D GRE.

Cite

@article{arxiv.2308.07811,
  title  = {Improved test-retest reliability of $\textit{R}_2^*$ and susceptibility quantification using multi-shot multi echo 3D EPI},
  author = {Yujia Huang and Lin Chen and Xu Li and Jiaen Liu},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.07811},
  year   = {2024}
}

Comments

18 pages, 8 figures and 1 table

R2 v1 2026-06-28T11:56:07.217Z