English

Helmholtz boundary integral methods and the pollution effect

Numerical Analysis 2026-03-24 v3 Numerical Analysis Analysis of PDEs

Abstract

This paper is concerned with solving the Helmholtz exterior Dirichlet and Neumann problems with large wavenumber kk and smooth obstacles using the standard second-kind boundary integral equations. We consider Galerkin and collocation methods -- with subspaces consisting of either\textit{either} piecewise polynomials (in 2-d for collocation, in any dimension for Galerkin) or\textit{or} trigonometric polynomials (in 2-d) -- as well as a fully discrete quadrature (Nystr\"om) method based on trigonometric polynomials (in 2-d). For each of these methods, we prove -- in many cases for the first time -- rigorous results about the fundamental question: how quickly must the number of degrees of freedom (the dimension of the approximation space) grow with kk to maintain accuracy of the computed solution? Importantly, we determine which of these methods suffer from the pollution effect\textit{the pollution effect}. That is, we address the question: must the number of points per wavelength \to \infty to maintain accuracy as kk\to\infty?

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2507.22797,
  title  = {Helmholtz boundary integral methods and the pollution effect},
  author = {Jeffrey Galkowski and Manas Rachh and Euan A. Spence},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.22797},
  year   = {2026}
}
R2 v1 2026-07-01T04:26:17.993Z