English

Hybridizable Discontinuous Galerkin Methods for Helmholtz Equation with High Wave Number. Part I: Linear case

Numerical Analysis 2020-05-01 v1 Numerical Analysis

Abstract

This paper addresses several aspects of the linear Hybridizable Discontinuous Galerkin Method (HDG) for the Helmholtz equation with impedance boundary condition at high frequency. First, error estimates with explicit dependence on the wave number kk for the HDG approximations to the exact solution uu and its negative gradient q=u\mathbf{q}=-\nabla u are derived. It is shown that kuuhL2(Ω)+qqhL2(Ω)=O(k2h2+k4h3)k\Vert u - u_h \Vert_{L^2(\Omega)} + \Vert \mathbf{q} -\mathbf{q}_h \Vert_{L^2(\Omega)} = O(k^2h^2+k^4h^3) under the conditions that k3h2k^3h^2 is sufficiently small and that the penalty parameter τk\tau\eqsim k, where hh is the mesh size. Note that the convergence order in qh\mathbf{q}_h is full and the pollution error is O(k4h3)O(k^4h^3), which improve the existent results. Secondly, by using a standard postprocessing procedure from the HDG method for elliptic problems, a piecewise quadratic function uhu_h^* is obtained so that kuuhL2(Ω)=O(k3h3+k4h3)k\Vert u-u_h^*\Vert_{L^2(\Omega)}=O(k^3h^3+k^4h^3). Note that the postprocessing procedure improves only the interpolation error (from O(k2h2)O(k^2h^2) to O(k3h3)O(k^3h^3)) but leaves the pollution error O(k4h3)O(k^4h^3) unchanged. Thirdly, dispersion analyses and extensive numerical tests show that the pollution effect can be eliminated completely in 1D case and reduced greatly in 2D case by selecting appropriate penalty parameters. The preasymptotic error analysis of the higher order HDG method for the Helmholtz equation with high wave number is studied in Part II.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2004.14553,
  title  = {Hybridizable Discontinuous Galerkin Methods for Helmholtz Equation with High Wave Number. Part I: Linear case},
  author = {Bingxin Zhu and Haijun Wu},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.14553},
  year   = {2020}
}

Comments

19 pages, 16 figures