English

Growth Index after the Planck Results

Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics 2013-11-01 v3

Abstract

The growth index γL\gamma_L was proposed to investigate the possible deviation from the standard Λ\LambdaCDM model and Einstein's gravity theory in a dynamical perspective. Recently, thanks to the measurement of the cosmic growth rate via the redshift-space distortion, one can understand the evolution of density contrast through fσ8(z)f\sigma_8(z), where f(z)=dlnδ/dlnaf(z)=d\ln \delta/d \ln a is the growth rate of matter and σ8(z)\sigma_8(z) is the rms amplitude of the density contrast δ\delta at the comoving 8h18h^{-1} Mpc scale. In this paper, we use the redshift space distortion data points to study the growth index on the bases of Einstein's gravity theory and a modified gravity theory under the assumption of f=Ωm(a)γLf=\Omega_m(a)^{\gamma_L}. The cosmic background evolution is fixed by the cosmic observations from the type Ia supernovae SNLS3, cosmic microwave background radiation data from {\it Planck} and baryon acoustic oscillations. Via the Markov Chain Monte Carlo method, we found the γL\gamma_L values for Einstein's gravity with a cosmological constant, w=constantw=constant dark energy and a modified gravity theory in the 1,2,3σ1,2,3\sigma regions respectively: 0.6750.06620.1200.155+0.0611+0.129+0.1780.675_{-0.0662-0.120-0.155}^{+0.0611+0.129+0.178}, 0.7450.08190.1460.190+0.0755+0.157+0.2050.745_{-0.0819-0.146-0.190}^{+0.0755+0.157+0.205} and 0.5550.01670.03730.0516+0.0193+0.0335+0.04360.555_{-0.0167-0.0373-0.0516}^{+0.0193+0.0335+0.0436}. In the Einstein's gravity theory, the values of growth index γL\gamma_L show almost 2σ2\sigma deviation from the theoretical prediction 6/11 for the Λ\LambdaCDM model. However in the modified gravity framework, a deviation from the Einstein's relativity is not detected in 1σ1\sigma region. That implies that the currently available cosmic observations don't expect an alternative modified gravity theory beyond the Λ\LambdaCDM model under Einstein's gravity, but that the simple assumption of f=ΩmγLf=\Omega_m^{\gamma_L} should be improved.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1306.2683,
  title  = {Growth Index after the Planck Results},
  author = {Lixin Xu},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1306.2683},
  year   = {2013}
}

Comments

to match the published version, to appear in PRD

R2 v1 2026-06-22T00:32:23.088Z