Let Fq denote the finite field of q elements. For E⊂Fqd, denote the distance set Δ(E)={∥x−y∥2:=(x1−y1)2+⋯+(xd−yd)2:(x,y)∈E2}. The Erdos quotient set problem was introduced in \cite{Iosevich_2019} where it was shown that for even d≥2 that if ∣E∣⊂Fq2 such that ∣E∣>>qd/2, then Δ(E)Δ(E):={ts:s,t∈Δ(E),t=0}=Fqd. The proof of the latter result is quite sophisticated and in \cite{pham2023group}, a simple proof using a group-action approach was obtained for the case of q≡3mod4 when d=2. In the q≡3mod4 setting, for each r∈(Fq)2, \cite{pham2023group} showed if E⊂Fq, then V(r):=#{(a,b,c,d)∈E2:∥c−d∥2∥a−b∥2=r}>>q∣E∣4. In this work we use group action techniques in the q≡3mod4 setting, for d=2 and improve the results of \cite{pham2023group} by removing the assumption on r∈(Fq)2. Specifically we show if d=2 and q≡3mod4, then for each r∈Fq∗,V(r)≥2q∣E∣4if ∣E∣≥2q for all r∈Fq. Finally, we improve the main result of \cite{bhowmik2023near} using our proof techniques from our quotient set results.
Cite
@article{arxiv.2402.17141,
title = {Group Action Approaches in Erdos Quotient Set Problem},
author = {Will Burstein},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.17141},
year = {2024}
}