English

Fourier coefficients of $\times p$-invariant measures

Dynamical Systems 2017-10-03 v2

Abstract

We consider densities DΣ(A)D_\Sigma(A), DΣ(A)\overline{D}_\Sigma(A) and DΣ(A)\underline{D}_\Sigma(A) for a subset AA of N\mathbb{N} with respect to a sequence Σ\Sigma of finite subsets of N\mathbb{N} and study Fourier coefficients of ergodic, weakly mixing and strongly mixing ×p\times p-invariant measures on the unit circle T\mathbb{T}. Combining these, we prove the following measure rigidity results: on T\mathbb{T}, the Lebesgue measure is the only non-atomic ×p\times p-invariant measure satisfying one of the following: (1) μ\mu is ergodic and there exist a F\o lner sequence Σ\Sigma in N\mathbb{N} and a nonzero integer ll such that μ\mu is ×(pj+l)\times (p^j+l)-invariant for all jj in a subset AA of N\mathbb{N} with DΣ(A)=1D_\Sigma(A)=1; (2) μ\mu is weakly mixing and there exist a F\o lner sequence Σ\Sigma in N\mathbb{N} and a nonzero integer ll such that μ\mu is ×(pj+l)\times (p^j+l)-invariant for all jj in a subset AA of N\mathbb{N} with DΣ(A)>0\overline{D}_\Sigma(A)>0; (3) μ\mu is strongly mixing and there exists a nonzero integer ll such that μ\mu is ×(pj+l)\times (p^j+l)-invariant for infinitely many jj. Moreover, a ×p\times p-invariant measure satisfying (2) or (3) is either a Dirac measure or the Lebesgue measure. As an application we prove that for every increasing function τ\tau defined on positive integers with limnτ(n)=\lim_{n\to\infty}\tau(n)=\infty, there exists a multiplicative semigroup SτS_\tau of Z+\mathbb{Z}^+ containing pp such that Sτ[1,n](logpn)τ(n)|S_\tau\cap[1,n]|\leq (\log_p n)^{\tau(n)} and the Lebesgue measure is the only non-atomic ergodic ×p\times p-invariant measure which is ×q\times q-invariant for all qq in SτS_\tau.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1606.06078,
  title  = {Fourier coefficients of $\times p$-invariant measures},
  author = {Huichi Huang},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.06078},
  year   = {2017}
}

Comments

Thanks to help of the anonymous referee and Anatole Katok, mistakes are corrected and Theorem 5.3 is improved to a better version. The proof of Theorem 4.1 is simplified. Accepted for publication by Journal of Modern Dynamics